PressNook
Politics

British Judge Revives Contempt Proceedings Against Lawyer

Robert Ashton 27.06.2026

A Second Chance at Contempt

A UK judge has referred a senior lawyer to the Court of Appeal for contempt proceedings for a second time, in an unprecedented move. Rajiv Menon KC was initially found to have acted unlawfully, but Justice Johnson has renewed the proceedings. The case has sparked controversy and raised questions about the limits of free speech in the UK.

Menon was representing Palestine Action, a group that has been protesting against the UK government's policies. The lawyer's actions were deemed unlawful during his first attempt, but Justice Johnson has given him another chance to face contempt proceedings. This decision has been met with surprise and concern from some in the legal community.

Can a Lawyer Be Held in Contempt Twice?

The case has raised questions about the rules surrounding contempt proceedings and whether a lawyer can be held in contempt twice for the same actions. Some have argued that the decision is a threat to free speech, while others see it as a necessary measure to maintain order in the courts. The Court of Appeal will now consider the case and decide whether Menon is guilty of contempt.

Frequently Asked Questions

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for lawyers and protesters in the UK, and may set a new precedent for contempt proceedings. The legal community will be watching closely as the case unfolds.

What is contempt of court? Contempt of court refers to actions that disobey or disrespect the authority of a court. In this case, Menon is accused of acting unlawfully while representing Palestine Action. Can a lawyer be held in contempt more than once? This case is thought to be unprecedented, so there is no clear answer. The Court of Appeal will decide whether Menon can be held in contempt for a second time. What are the potential consequences for Menon? If found guilty, Menon could face penalties, including fines or imprisonment, although this is considered unlikely for a senior lawyer.

Share:

More stories: