Why Capex Sustainability Matters for the Trade
Chris Wood, Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies, reaffirmed his preference for the „picks and shovels” investment approach during the KBFG Korea Conference in Seoul on September 9, 2026, citing sustained capital expenditure as the key driver. He emphasized that as long as companies continue investing in infrastructure and equipment, the trade remains valid. Wood also highlighted China’s domestic market advantages in the ongoing AI development cycle, noting its scale and policy support give it a competitive edge over other regions.
Latest news
Swedish Voters Choose New Parliament as Left-Wing Coalition Projects to Win Majority
Trump Announces End of US Tariff on Irish Whisky
Frances Stonor Saunders, Author of CIA Cultural Espionage Exposé, Dies at 66
Israel and Lebanon to Hold Security Talks in Rome This OctoberWood explained that the „picks and shovels” strategy—favoring suppliers of equipment and materials over end-product makers—thrives when capital spending is robust. He pointed to ongoing investments in semiconductors, data centers, and industrial automation as evidence that the foundation for the trade remains intact. According to Wood, weakening capex would be the primary signal to reassess the position, but current trends show no such deterioration. He added that global tech supply chains are still adjusting to post-pandemic demand shifts, creating lingering opportunities for upstream beneficiaries.
How China’s Domestic Strength Shapes the AI Outlook
When asked about China’s role in the AI boom, Wood argued that its large internal market allows for faster iteration and deployment of AI applications compared to export-dependent economies. He noted that government-backed initiatives in AI research and adoption are accelerating local demand for chips, servers, and related hardware. This domestic momentum, he said, reduces reliance on volatile overseas markets and provides a more stable growth trajectory for Chinese tech suppliers. Wood cautioned, however, that geopolitical tensions could still pose risks to international collaboration.
What does the „picks and shovels” trade refer to in this context? It refers to investing in companies that provide tools, equipment, and infrastructure—such as semiconductor manufacturers and industrial machinery makers—rather than those producing final consumer goods or software.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does Wood believe China has an edge in the AI cycle? He cites China’s large domestic market, strong government support for AI development, and accelerating local adoption of AI technologies, which together create a more resilient demand base for tech hardware.
Is there a specific condition that would make Wood reconsider this stance? Yes, he stated that a significant and sustained decline in global capital spending would be the key factor prompting a reevaluation of the „picks and shovels” trade.
