The Emerging Democratic Test of AI
Alain Berset, the Council of Europe’s Secretary General, addressed an audience in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, on April 28, 2026. In his speech he warned that the rise of artificial intelligence is now a litmus test for democratic security, a concept built on fundamental rights. The remarks followed a Europe‑wide poll in which 46 percent of young respondents said they could not picture the internet in 2036.
Latest news
Germany Boosts Defense Spending Ahead of NATO Summit
Russian Nuclear Staff to Return to Iranian Plant
NATO Tensions: US Ambassador Calls Discord "Growing Pains" Amidst Trump's Pressure
Gavin Newsom Calls White House Reporters “Sycophants” After Oval Office Exchange with Donald TrumpBerset’s warning reflects growing anxiety across the continent. Rapid advances in AI are reshaping economies, media, and public services, while existing legal frameworks lag behind. The Council of Europe, tasked with safeguarding human rights and the rule of law, is under pressure to craft policies that balance innovation with protection. The youth survey, conducted last month, highlighted a generational gap: nearly half of respondents admitted they could not imagine the digital landscape a decade from now, underscoring uncertainty about future governance.
The Council’s analysis frames AI as a security challenge that tests democratic resilience. Berset argued that unchecked AI could erode privacy, amplify misinformation, and concentrate power in the hands of a few corporations. He cited recent incidents where algorithmic bias led to discriminatory outcomes in hiring and law enforcement. „Our democratic institutions must adapt,” he said, „or risk being outpaced by technology that does not respect human dignity.” The Council is now drafting a charter that would embed rights‑based safeguards into AI development, requiring transparency, accountability, and auditability for high‑risk systems.
Can Europe Build a Rights‑Based AI Framework?
Youth perspectives reinforce the urgency. The poll’s open‑ended responses revealed a mix of optimism and fear. Some participants envisioned AI‑driven education and health services, while others feared surveillance and loss of agency. The 46 percent who could not imagine the internet in 2036 represent a silent majority that may feel excluded from policy debates. Their uncertainty signals a need for inclusive dialogue, ensuring that future digital ecosystems reflect societal values rather than technocratic visions.
Policymakers face a daunting question: can Europe construct an AI governance model rooted in human rights without stifling innovation? Experts suggest a multi‑layered approach, combining mandatory impact assessments, public oversight committees, and cross‑border cooperation. Berset emphasized the importance of aligning AI regulations with the European Convention on Human Rights, arguing that rights‑first principles can guide ethical design. Critics warn that overly strict rules could push AI firms to relocate to jurisdictions with looser standards, potentially creating a regulatory race‑to‑the‑bottom. Balancing these forces will require political will, technical expertise, and sustained public engagement.
If Europe succeeds, the continent could set a global benchmark for responsible AI, reinforcing democratic values while fostering economic growth. Failure, however, may embolden authoritarian actors to exploit AI for control, deepening the digital divide. The coming years will test whether European institutions can translate lofty ideals into concrete safeguards that protect citizens and preserve the open internet.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Council of Europe’s role in AI governance? The Council advises member states on human‑rights‑compatible policies, drafts guidelines for ethical AI, and monitors compliance with democratic standards.
Why do so many young Europeans feel unable to imagine the internet in 2036? Rapid technological change, combined with limited public discourse on AI’s societal impact, fuels uncertainty and a sense of disconnect from future digital scenarios.
Will a rights‑based AI charter limit innovation? Proponents argue that clear rules can steer innovation toward socially beneficial outcomes, while opponents fear excessive regulation could deter investment and slow development.